Frank Cascio, once known as part of Michael Jackson’s so-called “second family,” has come forward alongside his siblings with alarming new claims about the late singer.
He accuses Jackson of deceit, manipulation, coercion, and inappropriate conduct that he says left his family with lasting scars.
The account emerged in a series of court declarations in which Frank, 44, his sister Marie-Nicole Porte, 37, and brother Aldo Cascio, 34, describe being forced as children to hide from Jackson’s own lawyer while staying with him during one of the darkest periods of his life.
Jackson’s estate, through co-executor John Branca, rejects the allegations and maintains that the siblings are attempting to extort the estate after violating a 2019 settlement agreement that was, according to him, paid in exchange for their silence.
Michael Jackson’s “second family” is accusing his estate of paying them hush money to cover up what he did to them
Image credits: Mark Mainz/Getty Images
The controversy exploded at a time when Jackson’s name has become topical again due to the release of the teaser trailer for the 2026 biopic Michael, starring Jaafar Jackson.
According to Porte, in 2003 and 2004, when Jackson was arrested and indicted on charges unrelated to their family, she and her brother Aldo, then 15 and 12, were frequently present at the pop star’s homes and hotel suites.
During those times, Jackson’s lawyer, Mark Geragos, would often visit to discuss the criminal case. But, according to Porte, the siblings were ordered to vanish the moment Geragos arrived.
Image credits: jacksondynasty
“We were told by Michael to hide,” she said in her declaration.
“Michael seemed nervous and very paranoid about the possibility of Mr. Geragos discovering we were there.
He told us things to the effect of ‘the lawyer cannot know you are here’ and ‘stay in here and do not come out until I say it’s okay.’ He also told us not to make any noise.”
Image credits: Yulia Julia/Facebook
Years later, the siblings revealed this to Geragos, who now represents them, and explained that Jackson had hidden them from him during his legal representation, and that they were ab*sed as children.
The siblings were each paid $3 million in exchange for their silence, and were allegedly told they couldn’t seek legal counsel
Image credits: VincentFAmen
The siblings further allege that Jackson’s estate acted deceptively in an effort to silence their accounts, accusing its executors of coercion.
Their declarations claim that in late 2019, months after Leaving Neverland reignited public scrutiny of the singer, representatives of the estate pressured them into signing what they describe as a “life rights agreement.”
“The entire situation was rushed, pressured, and overwhelming,” Marie-Nicole Porte said.
Image credits: Entertainment Tonight
She added that no lawyers were present when the contract was read aloud, and that only one copy of the document was made available for multiple family members to sign.
The siblings also claim they were warned that if they sought legal advice, “the deal would not get done or it would take years to finalize.”
Aldo Cascio revealed that they were told not to mention the agreement or “the underlying [inappropriate] conduct” to Jackson’s children, describing the secrecy as profoundly distressing.
The estate, through co-executor John Branca, dismissed the siblings’ claims as false and called their filing a $213 million extortion attempt
Image credits: HBO
According to Branca, the 2019 payments, consisting of $3 million each to several longtime associates, including members of the Cascio family, were mutual settlements.
He said the deals were meant to protect Jackson’s children and legacy during a volatile period after Leaving Neverland aired, and that everyone involved signed strict nondisclosure clauses.
“It said you can’t even tell people there’s an agreement,” Branca told The New York Post. “It allowed us to move forward with projects that would preserve Michael’s legacy.”
Image credits: Kevin Winter/Getty Images
The Cascio siblings, on the other hand, insist that the agreement was not entered into freely or transparently, saying they were denied legal counsel during the process.
“Being branded a liar or extortionist about my childhood ab*se has been humiliating, degrading and deeply wounding,” Aldo said.
Now, their decision to break their silence threatens to reopen one of the most controversial chapters in Jackson’s legacy.
Their claims have revived interest in the late singer’s behind-the-scenes conduct and the lengths his inner circle allegedly went to protect his image.
A judge will soon decide whether the case remains confined to private arbitration or moves into open court. There, for the first time, the full extent of the siblings’ experiences could finally come to light.
“What about the parents?” Readers shared their thoughts on the case across social media
Follow Us
